Andrew Carnegie views fits well in the definition of the Gospel of Wealth which is a common phenomenon today. His discussion about civilization and the role of the wealthy man versus the poor is interesting. According to him, there is need to change in the trend of accumulation of wealth as per religion is concerned. He illustrates this through the historical state of the poor and the rich criticizing the Hindu caste system even though not coming out clearly that it hinders some people from raising their own wealth according to their wish and ability. In addition, he disagrees with the idea of the argument that hard work is the source of wealth and poverty is a result of laziness to justify accumulation of riches at the expense of the poor.
Andrew’s opinion sounds caring and justified on the touching about the responsibility of the wealthy man. He thinks that the wealthy should be humble and moderate while taking care of the poor with their wealth. He represents this as a religious duty. Consequently, he objects the message that the wealth increment through the use of extra funds made from profit helps in social welfare and therefore is right. I agree with him because direct distribution of the wealth to the poor unlike the thinking of capitalism on social welfare through putting profits back to business.
In conclusion, Andrew is against the capitalist economy which encourages few people at the top of the ladder. He thinks that the ideology should be bent at least to be in line with the values of humanity.